By John Gavin @johngavincomedy

It’s been a few weeks now since the BBC broadcast their report on Rangers owner Craig Whyte. The programme asked some questions about Mr Whyte business background. It’s worth noting that this blog will not repeat any of the allegations disputed by Mr Whyte, as his immediate reaction to the programme was to threaten legal action and then put a stop to all communications with the BBC. If he were to break all communications between Rangers and Scottish Comedy FC then it would hardly be a major blow to us here at the site – it’s not like any of us have direct access to Ally McCoist’s mobile number – but legal action would definitely not be something we would welcome. We are a bunch of comedians and have less spare cash than even Rangers do.

Smith regrets mentioning that he thought he saw Jackie Bird in the stand.
There is something that does seem puzzling about Whyte’s response to the BBC programme though. Literally the day after its broadcast the following statement was released by a spokesman –
“Craig Whyte strenuously refutes these unfounded and defamatory allegations and has instructed his lawyers, Carter Ruck, to commence immediate legal proceedings against the BBC. Any repetition of these false accusations will also be met with legal action.”

His use of law firm Carter Ruck is noteworthy, given their own high-profile status gained by acting for high-profile clients in libel cases. Past clients have included Liam Gallagher, Sir Elton John, Simon Cowell, Jude Law, Chelsea, Tesco, The Church of Scientology and the State of Qatar. Not exactly a small-time operation then. It is worth noting though that they do offer some services on a ‘no win, no fee’ basis, although we don’t know whether that’s what swung Whyte’s decision when choosing them.

"If the boss sees you talking to me he'll go mental..."
The thing that’s puzzling though, is that one of the main claims made in the BBC programme was that Whyte had been disqualified from being a company director. This was broadcast on the 20th of October. On the 30th of November, Whyte confirmed that the claim was in fact true and he was indeed disqualified 11 years ago from being a company director for 7 years.

This raises the question, why come out all guns blazing when he knew that one of the main claims was not actually a claim, but a fact? It’s not like forgetting where you put your keys then suddenly finding them in that jacket you hadn’t worn in a couple of weeks. It’s a very serious matter. Serious enough that he now faces investigation by the SFA into whether or not he meets their ‘fit and proper person’ criteria.

Rangers 2nd bid for Goodwillie.
The Rangers support were disappointed earlier in the season when moves for the likes of David Goodwillie, Kenny Miller, Wesley Verhoek, Tomer Hemed, Craig Conway, and Murray Davidson failed to come to fruition. Craig Whyte had promised a £5million transfer kitty for Ally McCoist, which many fans had interpreted as being the amount available for transfer fees alone. Whyte has since said that Rangers surpassed this total…by clarifying that it included new and improved contracts for existing squad members like Steven Whittaker. He has, however, admitted that mistakes were made in the pursuit of transfer targets. Take the attempted bid for David Goodwillie. It was the equivalent of offering to pay Dundee Utd in Irn Bru bottles. Or the attempts to re-sign Kenny Miller. Rangers sold him for £400,000 in January. At this point he had just a few months left on his contract. It then became clear that he would be available again in the summer… so Rangers offered £400,000. The thing is that Miller was now tied to a contract for another 2 years. It doesn’t take a genius to work out that his market value had changed. Rangers refused to budge and Miller joined Cardiff City for £870,000.

Then there was the departure from the board of John Greig, a man voted by fans as the club’s ‘Greatest Ever’ and who has essentially given a lifetime’s work to Rangers. Whatever his reasons for leaving, the manner of his departure can be considered a PR disaster for Craig Whyte.

Then throw into the mix what can be considered his biggest failing since taking over at Rangers, his unwillingness to actually engage with anyone. After the BBC programme, Whyte could have come out and said “this bit was true, this bit wasn’t, I’m going to raise legal action against them for the bits that were not true”. As it stands, his admission regarding the disqualification – over a month after the broadcast and after his threat of legal action – must lead even the most hardened of Rangers fans to feel that greater clarity and communication would be welcome.

News that Whyte may have just got a parking ticket was met with a positive response.
Whyte took over a club with a 138 year history and a fan base of hundreds of thousands worldwide who spend their hard earned cash contributing to the running of the club. Did he really expect to just buy the club and then no one would want to know more about him?

Who knows, it might all turn out ok. The HMRC case (a whole piece on Rangers and this is the first time that’s come up, what is the world coming too!) might end up in Rangers favour, McCoist may win the double, and Whyte may broker deals which leave Rangers in a much more secure financial position. As long as he gives us a clue then he will help his own case dramatically.
———————————————————————————————————-

About the Author

John started his comedy career back in 2008 after his wife signed him up for a comedy competition in the Sunday Mail, without his knowledge. He ended up winning it and going on to the final of So You Think You’re Funny. A year later he won Scottish Comedian of the year. He talks about his home life with his wife and 3 daughters mostly as there is very little else exciting that happens in his life.

He has followed Rangers all his life. As a 5 year old boy he spent his birthday money on his first Rangers strip complete with number 9 on the back. It was also around that time that he was taken to a barbers for a haircut and asked to get his hair done like Frank McAvennie. As he had short, brown, poker straight hair the barber struggled to recreate the long blonde permed look that McAvennie sported at the time. This is a tale that his mother likes to share from time to time.

He also distantly related to Rangers hall of fame member Willie Waddell. It is very distant, but its close enough that he likes to use this to make him look like a big man.

His football career took a nose dive in secondary school when he found out he was actually a better rugby player than footballer. Brief stints at 5 a sides in 20′s followed. Since a tragic accident in which he slipped and fell on some ice due to his insistance on wearing converse all stars, he broke his left leg. Since then he has been too much of a big Jessie to grace a pitch again.

“All the makings of a class act”Chortle

“Brilliant”Sunday Mail

“Hard hitting and side splitting”Daily Record

“There’s a rosy future ahead for John Gavin”Scotsman

“Very Impressive”Edinburgh Evening News

Follow John on Twitter – @johngavincomedy

John’s website – www.johngavincomedy.com

I know this has been a long one, but thanks for reading.

Just tell us it’s going to be all Whyte. A plea from John Gavin to the Rangers owner.

Comments

comments

Tagged on:                                                         

2 thoughts on “Just tell us it’s going to be all Whyte. A plea from John Gavin to the Rangers owner.

  • December 7, 2011 at 10:38 am
    Permalink

    We were talking in the pub about this guy last night and the general consensus was” that there is something not quite right aboot him”.

    Good post.

    Reply
  • December 7, 2011 at 4:25 pm
    Permalink

    Fair play to someone from the blue corner willing to be sceptical about the current owner (when does he stop being “the new owner” by the way?). In my experience this is very rare, although perhaps the doubts are simply being kept in the family.

    Anyway, I was particularly interested in the statement – “As long as he gives us a clue then he will help his own case dramatically”. This is very similar to the stock defence of Whyte offered by the average semi-sceptical Rangers fan of “we have to give him time to show his true intentions” (again we have to ask at what point has Whyte had “enough time” to show his “true intentions”.

    The trouble with both these premises is that they both assume benevolent intent, which given Whyte’s background would hardly seem a safe assumption.

    How long do you give a lion to show his “true intentions”? When its incisors are on the prey’s jugular? You can’t expect a vulture to come out and say “I’m a vulture”, that’s why wolves have sheep’s clothing.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

x
Like us on Facebook!